1. Initial Review
 

All images in each category are first displayed silently for the judge to view as a group.
 

2. Individual Image Review
 

Images are then shown one at a time:

• The Digital Coordinator announces the image title.

• The judge studies the image and provides critique.

• For assigned topics, the judge may determine an image does not meet the theme. 

  • If moved to Open, the image cannot receive a Merit.

• The judge comments on: 

  • Technical execution

  • Artistic merit

  • Creativity

  • Presentation

  • Opportunities for improvement

• The judge assigns a score (5–10).

• Images scoring 8, 9, or 10 receive a Merit, and the maker’s name is announced.

• All merited images advance to the Annual Awards.

Judges may ask the maker a question during review.
Members must wait until judging is complete before asking questions or offering comments.

All judging decisions are final.

 

Scoring Guidelines
 

10 – Exceptional technical skill and impact; true “wow” factor  -  MERIT
9 – High technical skill and strong impact; a well-seen image  -  MERIT
8 – A good image needing only minor improvements  -  MERIT
7 – Average quality
6 – Below average; needs improvement
5 – Serious technical or artistic issues

 

​